The coronavirus has dominated all of our lives in recent months. Radical paths were taken by politicians in the form of lockdowns to contain the pandemic. But we should recognize that even if the coronavirus is a (major) challenge for us, we always have to keep a holistic view of world events. Just as there are epidemiological factors to consider in this crisis, there are also economic, social, cultural, political and other health factors at play. It is precisely these other factors that are so often forgotten in the panicky reporting, in the constant, manic tracking of the current infection numbers, that we want to take a look at in our series “The Costs of Coronavirus Lockdowns” in the coming weeks.
The costs of lockdowns and restrictions as a response to the coronavirus spread into every facet of society. The pandemic has triggered devastating secondary health crises. Even the unborn pay the price. Stillborn is a baby born with no sign of life after 28 weeks of pregnancy. The causes and factors are many, and sometimes unavoidable. But when women are less likely to seek treatment because one has to ‘stay home,’ one thing is for sure: those rates start rising globally.
A single-center study at a London hospital saw stillbirths rising fourfold. Sweden, on the other hand, did not see any significant change in the numbers between April and May in 2020 compared to those in 2019. Similar rates to those of England can be found in Uttar Pradesh, India, with almost a fourfold increase in stillbirths between March and August last year compared to the same period in 2019. In Nepal, the sharpest rise of 50% was observed during the first month of the pandemic when the most severe restrictions were in place.
As UNICEF reported in October 2020, due to severe COVID-related disruptions in health care services, more than 200.000 additional stillbirths could occur just in the next 12 months, concentrated in low- and middle-income countries. This comes after a steady drop in stillborn cases in the past three decades.
Comment
|
February 9th, 2021
Stillbirths on the Rise
The coronavirus has dominated all of our lives in recent months. Radical paths were taken by politicians in the form of lockdowns to contain the pandemic. But we should recognize that even if the coronavirus is a (major) challenge for us, we always have to keep a holistic view of world events. Just as there are epidemiological factors to consider in this crisis, there are also economic, social, cultural, political and other health factors at play. It is precisely these other factors that are so often forgotten in the panicky reporting, in the constant, manic tracking of the current infection numbers, that we want to take a look at in our series “The Costs of Coronavirus Lockdowns” in the coming weeks.
The costs of lockdowns and restrictions as a response to the coronavirus spread into every facet of society. The pandemic has triggered devastating secondary health crises. Even the unborn pay the price. Stillborn is a baby born with no sign of life after 28 weeks of pregnancy. The causes and factors are many, and sometimes unavoidable. But when women are less likely to seek treatment because one has to ‘stay home,’ one thing is for sure: those rates start rising globally.
A single-center study at a London hospital saw stillbirths rising fourfold. Sweden, on the other hand, did not see any significant change in the numbers between April and May in 2020 compared to those in 2019. Similar rates to those of England can be found in Uttar Pradesh, India, with almost a fourfold increase in stillbirths between March and August last year compared to the same period in 2019. In Nepal, the sharpest rise of 50% was observed during the first month of the pandemic when the most severe restrictions were in place.
As UNICEF reported in October 2020, due to severe COVID-related disruptions in health care services, more than 200.000 additional stillbirths could occur just in the next 12 months, concentrated in low- and middle-income countries. This comes after a steady drop in stillborn cases in the past three decades.
The views expressed on austriancenter.com are not necessarily those of the Austrian Economics Center.
Author
Team AEC
Related
Comment
FROM KEYNES TO OBAMA: FROM A BAD MODEL TO EVEN WORSE POLICY
August 24th, 2011
Comment
"North Korea – Time to Revisit Containment?"
April 4th, 2013
Comment
Who Will Watch the Watchers?
June 18th, 2013
Comment
Uber Revolutionizes Common Sense
January 11th, 2016
Comment
The Time to Laugh at Maduro’s Paranoia Has Passed
March 3rd, 2015
Team AEC